Last month, prominent Uighur rights group World Uighur Congress launched a similar appeal to the IOC over what it said were crimes against humanity in Xinjiang.The IOC responded that would remain neutral on political issues and said it had received assurances from Chinese authorities that they would respect the principles of the Olympic charter.The IOC did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Wednesday.China has already made extensive preparations for the upcoming Games, which they say are on track to be held from Feb. 4-20, 2022.There was similar outcry from rights groups ahead of the 2008 Beijing Olympics. At the time, the IOC defended the choice, saying the Games were a force for good. Over 160 human rights advocacy groups have delivered a joint letter to the chief of the International Olympic Committee (IOC) calling for it to reconsider its choice to award China the 2022 Winter Games in light of Beijing’s human rights record.It is the largest such coordinated effort so far following several months of similar calls from individual rights groups, and comes as Beijing is facing increased international backlash over policies including its treatment of ethnic Uighurs in Xinjiang and new security laws in Hong Kong.”The IOC must recognize that the Olympic spirit and the reputation of the Olympic Games will suffer further damage if the worsening human rights crisis, across all areas under China’s control, is simply ignored,” said the letter, which was released on Tuesday. The letter argues that the prestige of the Beijing 2008 Olympics emboldened the government to take further actions, including programs targeting Xinjiang Uighurs and other ethnic policies.China’s Foreign Ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the letter, but has on many occasions fiercely defended its rights record.It maintains policies in Xinjiang, Tibet and Hong Kong are key to national security and social stability.Among the letter’s signatories are Uighur, Tibetan, Hong Kong and Mongolian rights groups based in Asia, Europe, North America, Africa and Australia. Topics :
Simon Easterby has rejected Wales coach Shaun Edwards’ claims that Ireland play “very dangerous” rugby by employing the choke tackle. Forwards coach Easterby refused to be drawn into a war of words with Wales assistant Edwards over Ireland’s frequent and telling use of a tackle designed to hold the opponent off the ground. Former rugby league star Edwards has branded the choke tackle “a blight on the game that encourages high tackling”, but Easterby denied Ireland take any risks on safety with their approach. Press Association The tactic has been hugely successful for Ireland, who put it to good use to beat Wales in Dublin en route to claiming the 2014 Six Nations title. Ireland host England in Dublin on Sunday, before taking on Wales in Cardiff on March 14. Edwards addressed the media regarding perceived and purposeful obstruction dummy lines run by England players ahead of Wales’ clash with Stuart Lancaster’s side at the start of the tournament. The former Wasps coach has weighed into another wider rugby issue, suggesting the choke tackle puts player safety to the test. Ireland fly-half Johnny Sexton produced two pivotal turnovers from choke tackles on France’s express train centre Mathieu Bastareaud in his side’s 18-11 victory on February 14. The 29-year-old suffered a black eye and several eyebrow stitches from two clashes of heads with France’s bullish midfielder, but refused to stray from the tactic. While Easterby defended Joe Schmidt’s side’s right to continue to play within the game’s current laws, the former Ireland flanker was not about to let any rebuttal turn personal. The former British and Irish Lion instead turned his attention to the battle for Ireland’s loosehead prop berth, admitting a selection conundrum between Jack McGrath and Cian Healy. Fit-again Healy was released for Leinster action at the weekend after coming off the bench in Ireland’s victory over France. The British Lions front-rower is finally back up to speed after more than three months of hamstring trouble, and Easterby admitted he is ready to start if selected ahead of McGrath. “We’re lucky really that we’ve got Cian coming back to full fitness and up to speed on what we’re doing,” said Easterby. “He’s been out of the game for three months, he’s probably made a really quick recovery from that injury and he’s come back in unbelievable shape. “But we also have a player in Jack who has been phenomenal, and his numbers are high in everything that he does. “And we now have a great position in the loosehead that we do have two quality players in there we can call upon. “It’s a good position to be in, it’s not every position that we have that in. “Cian is definitely fit, yeah. “Listen it’s a nice position to be in, you’ve got Jack who has played a lot of rugby for us and done really well for a young man in a very attritional position.” Pressed on the issue and asked if Ireland play dangerous rugby, Easterby replied: “No.” The former Scarlets coach was however determined not to cloud the build-up to Sunday’s pivotal RBS 6 Nations clash with England by discussing the merits of the choke tackle at length. “He’s entitled to his opinion, but I don’t want to comment on that,” said Easterby of Edwards’ comments. “It’s a type of tackle that teams are using, just like a chop tackle is, just like an assist tackle, but I would prefer not to comment on what Shaun Edwards has said, because that’s outside of this environment and I don’t want to be commenting on that. “We’ve got to play within the law, and as long as we’re disciplined and play within the law, then that’s all we can ask of the players, and that’s what we’ll coach time and time again. “I really don’t have an opinion on what he said.” Ireland defence coach Les Kiss pioneered the choke tackle in 2011, to capitalise on a technicality of maul laws. The defending team attempts to hold the attacking player off the ground and hold the ball in the resulting maul – when play stagnates, the defending team win the put-in at the scrum and a turnover.